The tragic consequences of the flooding in Pakistan:

 

An urgent call from the All Pakistan Trade Union Federation (APTUF) for international workers' solidarity with the APTUF and its members !

 

The leadership of the APTUF has sent us this urgent message:

 

 

ALL Pakistan Trade Union Federation 

 

« At the very beginning of the tragedy that has struck our country, our union federation, the All Pakistan Trade Union Federation (APTUF), set up a special union committee in charge of getting back in contact with our unions and their members in the regions devastated by the floods: NWFP, Southern Punjab and Sind.

 

According to the information gathered, in one of these regions alone, 7 children of our members have died. Our members tell us that they have lost all their goods and livestock: goats and buffaloes.

 

According to the committee report, the disaster is getting worse by the day. The flooding has devastated practically the whole of the country. The disaster began in the country's Northwest Frontier Province. The damages caused to the country are uncountable, both on the material and the human levels. These events have occurred at a time when the weak and unpopular government is already struggling to cope with a faltering economy and a brutal war waged in the north of the country, which has already claimed the lives of thousands over the past few years.

 

The number of victims continues to grow. More than 14 million have been affected by this devastation, which is more than the combined total of the three big calamities the world has known in the last decade. (The total number of victims caused by the Asian Tsunami in 2004, the earthquake in Cashmere in 2005 and the Haiti earthquake in 2010, was estimated to be 11 million). Most are people who had to leave their homes to save their lives. But now their lives, properties and belongings are at stake.

 

Actual figures are not available, but it is estimated that more than 4,000 people have lost their lives. 80% of the country's food reserves have been destroyed by the flooding, which also caused massive damage to livestock, roads and overall infrastructure. The damages are estimated at $225 billion.  400 villages were totally smashed and lost in Peshwar and 50 in Dera Ghazi Khan.

 

But the worst is that this situation of generalised disaster and negligence by the authorities is identical to what happened 5 years ago, after the earthquake of 2005. As then, it is the poorest who pay the price of the catastrophe. What has been done during these past 5 years? Nothing has changed.

 

The State reacts as it always has. And the poor suffer. The mainstream media are busy politicizing every issue.

 

Exploiting a tragic situation, food prices continue to climb. The speculators and the market-makers will feed a few poor to console their conscience. They'll use the law of supply and demand and maximize profits. In these conditions, citizen volunteers are called into action.

 

A cursory look at the prevailing situation exposes the validity of all the reports and surveys presented in recent years. When people aren't killed by floods, they are killed by poverty or commit suicide. Those who survive live in miserable conditions and must face daily hardships. As for the State's role, it is the bad management which has brought the situation to the verge of disaster.

 

In Khyber Paktoon Kwa, more than 3 million people were displaced. Flooding  damaged installations like refineries, power providers, and cement and fertilizers plants. Losses to infrastructure, power transmission and distribution, banks and the telecommunication sector remain to be tallied.

 

There is a wide gap between the official response to the disaster and the massive challenge on the ground to provide rescue, food, clean drinking water, medicines and shelters.

 

One of the most common criticisms is that there had been very little preparation by the State for natural catastrophes. When the floods hit, only five helicopters could be dispatched to scour the affected areas for rescue. Later, the army stepped in, raising the total fleet to a much needed though still inadequate 30 choppers.

 

Some helicopters were diverted to transport camera crews to film soldiers plunging into high waters to rescue survivors.

 

Now, people say that the government is doing nothing. People are dying in the floods or from the damages caused to the infrastructure. Later they will die of hunger because of the destruction of crops, or from epidemics caused by lack of clean water. The damage is so great that it will require many years of permanent commitment to the victims to rebuild their future.

 

In such a situation our people respond, as they always have, by mobilising exceptional solidarity, both within the country and in the Pakistani Diaspora.

 

What are the APTUF and its activists doing?

 

They are organising a tour of unions and union members because in the tragic situation we find ourselves in, the workers need their independent organisations more than ever. A few days before the disaster, in a press conference, the APTUF called anew for peace and the satisfaction of workers' demands. In its attempt to help the union members and the population, the APTUF is supplying food and clothes.

 

Because of our limited financial means, we cannot provide shelter. The most urgent is to be able to call on doctors and to supply medicine due to the threats of epidemics.

 

We call on international workers solidarity so that the union may fulfil its tasks.

-- Lahore, 11 August  2010

 

* * * * * * * * * *

 

Help the APTUF & Its Members!

 

[   ] in my personal capacity

 

[   ] on behalf of my organisation

 

We invite labour organisations who so desire to:

 

- send messages of solidarity  (which we will  forward) to : stefan@macunlimited.net

 

- contribute to the funds which will be fully transmitted to the APTUF.

 

 

I / WE support APTUF's efforts   [    ]    

I  / WE will send ………… € or ………… £ / $.

 

 

 

Please make cheques payable to: “GMATUC - APTUF Pakistan Flood Disaster Fund”

 

Name …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………........

Address ………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Organisation …………………………………………………………

Position …………………..……………….

Email ………………………………………….……………..

Telephone ………………………………...…………...

 

 

Return to:    

Stefan Cholewka, (Secretary GMATUC)

 31 Spotland Rd,

Rochdale OL12 6PE

Tel/Fax: 01706 642899   

Mobile / Balckberry: 07901-913-698

email: stefan@macunlimited.net

 

 

 

 

 

  GMATUC BANNER Project 

Appeal for Funds

 

GMATUC has not got an official trade union banner. The number of events and activities that we are currently supporting and initiating particularly the TUC’s public sector alliance against the cuts will increase over the next few years in opposition to the Con-Dem coalition government. It seems politically and organisationally vital that we are seen to literally fly the flag in support of workers, youth and the unemployed and have a greater public profile in the NW region and nationally

 

We would like local TUC’s help in raising money for this banner project. A professionally made highest quality trade union banner will cost around £1,800 and lesser quality banners are available at lower price points. We would like to be able to get the best banner possible along with wooden poles and guide ropes.

 

All TUC affiliates and union branches that donate will be guaranteed that their emblem / name will appear on the GMATUC banner.

 

The GMATUC banner is YOUR banner and we want you to be proud of it.  

 

  GMATUC Banner Project 

     APPEAL –

 

Please make your donation, however small payable to: “GMATUC”

Send the cheque to the secretary at the address given below.

 

[     ]   In a personal capacity          [      ] On behalf of my organisation

 

I enclose the following financial support:    £100 [   ]   £50 [  ]    £25   [   ]      

£ 20    [  ]    £ 15 [    ]    £10    [    ]    £5  [    ]   £ Other [   ]

 

Name ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Address ………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Organisation …………………………………………………………..  

Position …………………..……………….

Email ………………………………………….

Telephone ……………………………….

 

Stefan CHOLEWKA, (GMATUC Secretary), 31 Spotland Road, Rochdale, OL12 6PE

 

Tel: 01706 642899   Mobile / Blackberry: 07901 913698

 Email: stefan@macunlimited.net

 

 


FOR A WORKERS' RECOVERY PLAN!


The recovery plan must put people first. Putting forward a workers' recovery plan becomes our job, Labour's job, in coalition with existing and potential allies and community allies already engaged in fighting the crisis. To implement this recovery program, Labour will need to mobilize union members and their organisations.

We face a once-in-a-lifetime economic crisis that threatens the very foundations of our economic well-being. The crisis threatens the well-being of America's working people and their families.

As this crisis shakes the base of the financial system, it has exposed the dangers of deregulation, it has exposed the blatant corruption of corporate domination of government, and it has exposed the fallacies of "free market" and "free trade." But it has also opened the way to push the government to promote a massive response on behalf of working people. It is both an opportunity and a requirement that we act immediately to stabilize workers and their families and that we redirect our economic system in a more economically just and environmentally sustainable direction.

The same corporate and banking elite that deliberately deregulated and manipulated our economy in pursuit of ever-bigger profits and larger markets are working hard to keep their prerogatives intact. The elite corporate-dominated economy is in deep recession, and in danger of taking the entire working class into a depression.

Organised labour, in our view, must take the lead and must promote aggressively demands for policies that would reverse our government's pro-business biases and steer policy toward dramatic improvement for the  British workforce.

No Corporate Bailouts: We must make a two-fold demand to the House of Commons: (1) track all tax £ pounds given out, to whom and for what, and (2) recapture by whatever means what was not used properly.


The City of London and the High Street cannot both be bailed out at the same time, because the City of London is about profiting from speculation, and the bailout is about funding the speculation.

Support the Public Sector:
Massive central government  assistance must immediately go to the regions and councils to maintain employment, health, and education, as well as services and ongoing projects.

Housing Security:
Access to affordable housing and access to reasonable loans must be stabilised.

Health Care for All: There must be an end to the privatisation of the NHS.

Reverse the tax cuts for the rich:
There is no justification for giving public money to the rich. Instead the highest income earners and the corporations should be taxed at a much higher rate. Retroactively tax Windfall Revenue on the oil-energy industry, on executive compensation and on corporate foreign retained earnings. Roll back capital income taxation to 1981 levels. Repatriate an estimated
£50bn from offshore tax havens.

Fund Human Needs, Not War: The UK support for American imperialist wars around the world are draining the lifeblood from our public sector and leaving working class families with unbearable difficulties and impossible debt for many years to come. The current war expenditures are now estimated at more than £5 bn in ultimate costs. This cannot be sustained.

Organised Labour must actively oppose these wars and the costly war budget and strongly urge the transformation of large sectors of the military-industrial economy into job retraining for a sustainable domestic and green economy. Labour must aggressively act to stabilise and advance the domestic economy and the interests of the British people.

What Nationalisation is Not


At a cost of nearly £20,000 per taxpayer, with little or nothing to date to show for it, it is time for practical proposals to nationalise the banking system. It is time to transfer the billions paid and/or allocated for bank bailouts toward bailing out British working and middle class families.

Whether from the City of London, newspaper  editorialists and  columnists, former Bank of England chairmen, or Nobel laureate economic professors, proposals that have been called 'bank nationalisation' to date have all been little more than schemas and facades for funding bank bailouts.  Some call proposals for the U.K. government to buy preferred stock in failing banks 'bank nationalisation'. Others call buying bank common stock, or purchasing some combination of convertible preferred-common stock, bank nationalisation.

Stock purchases in its various forms and whatever formal legal ownership that may confer, do not constitute 'bank nationalisation'.

Other proposals since the onset of the Banking Panic of October 2008 include government purchasing bank bad assets and depositing those toxic securities in a separate so-called government run 'Aggregator Bank'. Or having the  Bank of England  buy up a failed bank's remaining assets then reselling the cleaned up bank back to its original investors at fire sale prices.  Or other variations by which the government may assume 'temporary trusteeship' of a bank, re-privatise, and resell the restored institution at taxpayer expense.

But Government purchase and removal of bad assets from banks at taxpayer expense do not constitute bank nationalisation.

Nationalisation is not about who owns but about who benefits, about who makes the strategic decisions, and on behalf of whose interests those decisions are made. Nationalisation is not about ownership but about control.

Essential Elements of Nationalisation


Nationalisation is not about who is legal owner but who controls bank decision making and on behalf of whose interests that control is exercised--i.e. on behalf of the nation and its majority, the working and middle class British families, or the investors and management of the banks who, in pursuit of unmitigated individual greed, have driven those institutions into the ground.

Control is not exercised or achieved via mere inspection or oversight of existing bank management decisions.  Control is not a consequence of management reporting. Nor is it a result of government vetoing of management decisions.  Control is government representatives directly making all strategic decisions, as well as a range of important operational decisions. Nationalisation means the removal of bank senior management and boards of directors and their replacement with management directly accountable to government and with boards of directors representative of labour, community, and the broader public.

Nationalisation means control on behalf of the public interest, not private interests.  Nationalisation means removal of the private profit motive and its replacement with a national service motive.

Britain  needs a new kind of banking system.  Banks should function as utilities in the service of the nation and its people. Not as profit driven institutions.   It is time to begin fundamentally transforming that system, in a series of phased stages of nationalisation.

Some Immediate Practical Steps Toward Bank Nationalisation


Initial, immediate steps toward the full nationalisation of the banking system and its eventual transformation into a national non-profit utility, should include the following:

1. Homeowners' facing delinquency, default or foreclosure should have their mortgage principal payments reset to 2002-03 levels. And mortgage interest rates reset to current 30 year UK Treasury bond rates of 2.5%. All new mortgages issued should be similarly indexed not to exceed UK Treasury bond rates.  If banks can now borrow from the  Bank of England  today at 0.25% rates, why shouldn't homeowners be able to do so directly for 2.5%?   To administer the new, nationalised residential mortgage market, a new agency based around mutual / co-operative principles should be established.

2. Nationalisation of the banking system should also immediately extend to all consumer credit markets.  All vehicle, student, and related consumer credit loans should be financed directly through the  Bank of England, operating as 'lender of primary resort', with loan servicing provided by local credit unions and consumer loan interest rates indexed to the Bank of England's Discount Rate, at which banks are now permitted to borrow directly from the Bank of England.

3. Nationalisation should thereafter immediately extend similarly to the small business property markets, providing property financing for businesses employing 50 or fewer employees.

4.  No private banking interests should be permitted to serve on or lobby the Bank of England.

5. The Bank of England should have authority to regulate all credit card rates and terms, index credit card rates to appropriate short term interest rates, and establish a ceiling rate of no more than 7% on any credit card.

6. Permanent and impermeable regulatory firewalls should be set up, insulating residential and small business mortgage markets, consumer credit markets, and other credit sectors of direct import to consumers and the general public from the remaining still privatized sectors of the banking industry.

Once having achieved the above initial, immediate steps nationalising those sectors of the banking industry having had the greatest negative impact upon British working families, further sectors of the banking industry should be prioritised and plans developed for the eventual nationalisation and conversion of banking into a national utility, operated without profit, and managed on behalf of the needs of the nation and the majority of its populace.